Creative Partner for Progressive Brands

Addis Creson four-legged friends featured in Take Your Dog To Work Day article.

The American workplace is going to the dogs. Or rather, the dogs are going to the American workplace.

Friday is the 15th annual Take Your Dog to Work Day. And here in the pet-crazed Bay Area, the local canine contingent is expected to descend upon Internet startups, nail salons, auto-body shops and all manner of job sites as part of a yapping, shoe-chewing, scraps-begging trend that shows little sign of being curbed.

But for the many pets who already accompany their owners to work, Friday will be just another dog-day shift at the office. To get a peek at what this fur-infused scene might look like, drop by any day of the week at Addis Creson, a brand-strategy firm that has been welcoming its employees’ four-legged friends at its Berkeley location for 17 years.

“We’ve got five dogs in the office right now, all different shapes and sizes,” CEO Steve Addis said by phone this week. “It’s a great benefit for our employees because it assuages that guilt you feel leaving your dog at home.” And how’s everyone getting along? “We’ve only had to kick out two in all the years we’ve been doing this,” he said. “One was a Great Dane that got aggressive with another dog; the other attacked a parrot that a colleague had brought to work. That’s when we decided to change our policy to just allow dogs.”

Dogs are becoming a common presence in many workplaces. Nearly one in five companies in the United States now allows pets in the Advertisement workplace, according to a survey by the American Pet Products Association. Another poll by that group last year revealed that on any given day 1.4 million owners take some 2.3 million dogs to work at firms including Google (GOOG), Zynga and Amazon. And everyone seems to be taking their pets a lot more often: an average of 22 times in 2012 versus 17 times in 2008, a 29 percent increase.

“We’ve found that Americans’ love affair with their pets is at an all-time high,” said Beth Stultz, spokeswoman for Pet Sitters International, an educational association that created Take Your Dog to Work day in 1999. And as more and more employers see the important role pets play in their employees’ lives, we’ll see that trend continue to grow.”

That’s not surprising, says self-described pet psychic Barbara Reed with San Francisco-based Intuition for Animals. In her work helping pet owners whose animals are having “issues of some sort,” Reed has come to see firsthand the benefits of working men and women having man’s best friend at

Warren Bell sends out emails with his dog Moe de Maupassant in his office at Swift Test in Santa Clara, Calif. on Thursday, June 20, 2013. Bell is vice president of sales for the company and brings Moe to work with him every day. Moe even has his own business card with his title, chief customer satisfaction officer. Friday is National Take Your Dog to Work Day. (Gary Reyes/Bay Area News Group) (Gary Reyes)
their side all day long.

“Dogs can greatly reduce the stress people often feel at work,” Reed says, “because of their own quietude. When we observe them sitting there and accepting whatever happens around them, that helps keep us humans calm. And then when the dog gets goofy, that helps lighten things up.”

Dogs, it appears, are the best thing since sliced bread. Credited with everything from reducing their owners’ heart risks to helping them quit smoking, the more than 77 million pet dogs in the United States are increasingly being heralded as workplace heroes. Employers who allow and even encourage staff members to punch their time clocks with Fido in tow sometimes describe on-site dogs as miracle workers.
CEO Addis, for example, talks about how “dogs have such a wonderful optimism. We’ll have a staff meeting and just having the spirit of the dogs in the room has an intangible effect on people’s attitudes, and that drives their creativity and loyalty to the company.”

For Warren Bell, vice-president for worldwide sales at technology company SwiftTest in Santa Clara, Take Your Dog to Work Day feels like every other day for the past two years, dog-at-work-wise. Moe, his Australian shepherd-border collie mix, practically runs the joint. He commutes with Bell daily from their Saratoga home. He has his own business cards embossed with his title — chief customer satisfaction officer. He has his name on the door. He sits in on conference calls, delivers memos around the office, and drops in often on the office of CEO Philippe Vincent.
“Having Moe on a conference call or at a client meeting helps us break the ice,” Vincent said. “And every time we close a deal, Moe’s a big part of the celebration.”
Bell said Moe has pawed his way into SwiftTest’s corporate culture.

“He’ll sit in on all company meetings and participate in strategy,” said Bell, tongue partly in jowl. “And if we start debating and things get a bit contentious, as they sometimes do at startups, Moe will ease the tension just by walking around and soliciting pets and rubs. You can just feel the stress melt away.”

Read original article here.

Biting commentary: A new company is trying to make school meals healthier

“Biting commentary: A new company is trying to make school meals healthier”

The Economist – May 4, 2013

THE day a girl fainted from hunger was the final straw for Emmanuel George, the principal of Democracy Prep charter school in Harlem. She had refused to eat the “nasty food” served at his school. Her distaste was shared widely: many went hungry, and those who did eat mostly chose junk food. So in January Mr George switched to a supplier of healthy lunches called Revolution Foods. Since then the proportion of children choosing to accept free meals has gone from less than half to over 85%. Visits to the school nurse plummeted, and complaints of stomach-ache and headaches have almost vanished. Teachers say everyone works better in the afternoons.

Everyone from Michelle Obama to Jamie Oliver is trying to improve children’s diets, but doing so has proved difficult. It is, then, particularly interesting that a solution is emerging from the private sector. Revolution Foods, which is based in Oakland, California, serves 1m meals a week in nearly 1,000 schools across America. Most of its customers are public schools.

Despite a recent upgrade to the federal health standards (and funding) of school dinners, most are still made rather like airline food. Meals are put together in large processing centres, packaged, sometimes frozen, and then shipped across the country. When they arrive, the lunches are reheated in “retherm ovens” or warmers. This is certainly cheap, but does nothing for taste, freshness or nutrition.

Kristin Groos Richmond, co-founder of Revolution Foods, says despite a $16 billion market for food in schools, she felt there was no good way of delivering healthy meals. Instead she created a school-dinners company that used healthy and locally produced food with an emphasis on using children to design, and test, the meals. Something seems to be working: the company recently won a contract to serve food to 114 schools in the San Francisco Unified School District, and subsequently the proportion of children who chose to eat the free meals jumped by 12%.

None of the fare offered by Revolution contains junk-food staples such as high-fructose corn syrup or transfats. It is hormone- and antibiotic- free, and sometimes organic. Avoiding use of the deep-fat fryer has been hard. When Ms Groos Richmond began working with Washington schools she was asked to provide a chicken wing. It took over 1,000 attempts (along with tastings and focus groups) to create a child-approved baked chicken wing infused with a spicy sauce.

According to the company, the keys to winning children over to healthier foods are good presentation and trust. As children learn that the food tastes good, they become willing to try novelties such as lima beans. But Revolution Foods also receives daily reports on what is not being eaten. If necessary it will send someone in to promote particular foods, or create signs, in order to boost demand. This happened recently when its cauliflower florets were being rejected.

Healthy meals do cost more, though. For Revolution Foods to represent a challenge to the established system it would need to be making a profit, and it is not, although some of its regions are. The company says its rapid expansion means that it is not expecting to make money yet. (It was the second-fastest-growing inner-city company in 2012 according to the Initiative for a Competitive Inner City, a non-profit strategy group.)

On the day The Economist visited Democracy Prep, pupils had a choice between macaroni cheese (the real kind) and baked beans, or chicken pasta salad. Dessert was yogurt or whole-grain crackers. The menu also included sweetcorn and an orange. Little was left on the plates. A nutritionist from the company went from table to table explaining portion and serving size with props, showing the children that they need to eat four to six baseballs of vegetables a day. The pupils said that hamburgers and, surprisingly, the chicken Caesar salad were their favourite items on the menu. As ever, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Photo Credit: The Economist

Original article can be found here.

Irrationality

Hi! I’m Laurel, a brand strategist at Addis Creson.

I’ll be taking you through a Coursera online class, “A Beginner’s Guide to Irrational Behavior.” Throughout the six-week series, I’ll summarize key points that are relevant to the brand strategy discipline.

Dan Ariely is a professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at Duke University. His bestselling 2008 book, Predictably Irrational, presents the idea that previously ignored or misunderstood forces, such as emotions, environment, memories, and context, influence our decisions more than we think. We have an illusion of agency—we believe we are fully aware of all the reasons behind our actions. However, Ariely argues our decisions can be highly sensitive to situational factors and we are relatively insensitive to the impact of these factors. This argument holds that we misattribute behaviors affected by these factors to stable underlying preferences and, in turn, create stories to justify and explain our actions.

The example Ariely uses to illustrate this point is organ donation rates in European countries. Why do the Netherlands and Belgium—neighboring countries— have radically different organ donation rates? Most people attribute it to cultural differences or personal beliefs. In reality, it’s the design of the donation form. In the Netherlands, where people opt in to donate, participation rates hover around 28% despite massive awareness campaigns. Conversely, in Belgium, citizens must opt out, and their country boasts a 98% participation rate. This illustrates that the human norm is to take the path of least resistance. We don’t usually attribute our decisions to the context of the experience—in this case, the design of the organ donation form.

The chart below from Ariely & Norton’s article “How actions create – not just reveal – preferences.” Trends in Cognitive Science. 12(1) 2008, illustrates the factors at play when making a decision. It demonstrates that we think our decision making process is guided by consciously known, rational preferences (a). In reality, it’s more complicated than we realize. More is going on beneath the surface, and the full picture often does not match our rationalization (b).

Following this theory, Ariely proposes that focus groups are particularly uninformative because participants cannot articulate the full scope of why they do what they do. He argues that participant observation approaches (like ethnographic research) reveal more useful data. That is, Ariely’s theory holds that observational research is better suited to reveal the motivations behind behaviors, whereas focus groups reveal abstracted explanations of behaviors, which lead to distorted data.

The argument for or against focus groups is a point of contention in our industry. We’ve certainly sat through dozens of focus groups that didn’t reveal much in the way of breakthrough insights. However, when done well, focus groups can be an efficient and effective tool to stimulate discussion. However, findings from such sessions are directional and need to be used carefully.

In our own work, we have achieved excellent results from a more natural and engaging style of qualitative group inquiry. Whether the topic is new brand creation, culture building, sustainability, or strategy, we follow three inquiry design guidelines to reveal insights that lead to our clients’ success.
1. We choose an engaging environment appropriate to the research context.
2. We design interactive activities that allow individuals and groups to engage multiple ways of knowing.
3. We employ facilitators who are highly empathetic, adaptive, and imaginative.

Our philosophy is based in the belief that when we come together as a community of inquiry, we are able to create new knowledge and, in turn, design new futures.

Verlasso works to tackle sustainable salmon farming

by Marc Gunther

“In the fish counter, all the salmon are dead, all the salmon are red, and none of them can tell a story. It’s incumbent on us to tell the story.”

That’s Scott Nichols, the director of Verlasso. Verlasso, a joint venture of DuPont and AquaChile, farms salmon in Patagonia, and seeks to do so in a responsible way. So Scott has a story to tell.

“We feel a tremendous urgency to get this right,” Scott said, when we met recently in Washington. “We have to learn our way into it. We don’t have all the answers, and we may not have all the questions.”

A PhD biochemist who studied business at Wharton, Scott, 57, never expected to find himself in the business of fish farming. But as he researched new business opportunities for DuPont in the mid-2000s — he had earlier worked on improving the productivity of maize and beans and on Sorona, the company’s plant-based fiber — he got interested in salmon aquaculture. Aquaculture was booming, for obvious reasons: Demand for fish is growing, and the supply of wild-caught fish is flat.

The problem was salmon aquaculture then and now usually relies upon fish feed made in part from forage fish, such as anchovies, herring and sardines. About 4 pounds of wild-caught feeder fish are typically needed to produce the fish oil to make 1 pound of salmon, according to Verlasso. So salmon aquaculture, rather than easing pressures on the ocean’s stocks of wild fish, was actually making things worse.

“The system was broken,” Scott said.

Scientists at giant DuPont (2012 revenues: $35 billion) discovered that they could substitute a genetically-engineered yeast for the fish oils, and preserve the Omega-3 fatty acids that salmon require — and that makes salmon a healthful food for the rest of us. The plant-based feed was an environmentally preferable alternative to fish oil from forage fish but, unfortunately, it also cost more to produce.

So DuPont did a study to see if consumers would be willing to pay a premium for a “greener” fish. “There was a cohort of consumers who would pay for it,” Scott told me,  “and, in fact, there was cohort of consumers who were enthusiastic about it.”

Partnering with AquaChile

DuPont subsequently struck up a partnership with AquaChile, one of the world’s biggest aquaculture companies. [Norway is the world’s leading producer of farmed salmon, followed by Chile. Most of the salmon sold in the U.S. comes from Chile and British Columbia.] According to Scott, Alfonso Marquez de la Plata, the CEO of AquaChile who also directs Verlasso, shared his desire to produce protein in sustainable ways for an expanding global population.

As they built the company, they focused on feed. But their attention soon turned to other environmental issues. According to the Monterey Bay Aquarium, whose respected Seafood Watch program advises consumers to avoid farmed Atlantic salmon:
Most salmon are farmed in open pens and cages in coastal waters. Waste from these farms is released directly into the ocean. Parasites and diseases from farmed salmon can spread to wild fish swimming near the farms and escaping farmed salmon can harm wild populations.

Scott says Verlasso is working to address those issues, and others. Their salmon have more room to swim than do conventionally farmed salmon, so much so that Verlasso salmon are sleeker and lower in fat. “The body architecture is different,” he said, and the Verlasso salmon have a “cleaner, brighter flavor.”

I emailed John Ash, a northern California chef, author and teacher (and James Beard award-winner) who is committed to sustainability, to ask him about Verlasso. He replied:

Monterey Bay Aquarium and others I know are looking again at farmed salmon and are recognizing that they should be encouraging good efforts and not just rejecting them out of hand. The well-documented proof is that the future of seafood is farming and we should be encouraging ways to do it ethically and sustainably. Seems like Verlasso is on the right track. The fish are beautiful and not as “greasy” as conventionally farmed salmon in my experience.

The only drawback: Verlasso’s salmon cost more than conventional farmed salmon. Fresh Direct, which delivers groceries to homes in New York City and its suburbs, is selling Verlasso for between $9.99 and $13.99 a pound, less than wild-caught salmon but more than Atlantic farmed salmon. Verlasso is also selling in gourmet grocery stores like Central Market in Texas and Zupan’s in Portland, a good sign, according to Scott. “In Portland, salmon’s not a fish, it’s a religion,” he said. Whole Foods Market won’t carry Verlasso, at least for now, because of its genetically-modified yeast.

Nationally, sales remain modest — about 10,000 to 15,000 pounds per week — but the company is just getting started. The salmon is always sold under the Verlasso brand, sometimes accompanied by brochures on the fish counter telling the story. Scott told me that costs should come down, as Verlasso expands its retail presence and sales and benefits from economies of scale.

To reassure consumers that its salmon is environmentally-preferable, Verlasso is looking to have its environmental performance vetted by nonprofits like the Monterey Bay Aquarium and WWF, which is developing aquaculture standards. [See my2012 story on shrimp farming for YaleE360.] “Validation is very important,” Scott said.

So is getting salmon farming right. The world is going to need a lot more protein in the years to come.

Original article can be found here.

Image by Nordling via Shutterstock.

Steven Addis on the Tesla Model S: Worth fighting for?

“Tesla CEO Elon Musk is right to battle bad review of the Model S, experts say”

by John Boudreau

It’s often a bad idea to pick a fight with big media. But experts say Tesla CEO Elon Musk, whose Palo Alto-based electric car startup is at a critical crossroads, was right to come out swinging against a negative New York Times review of the Model S sedan.

Times writer John Broder, in a review published Sunday, wrote about a troubled trip from Washington, D.C., to Connecticut that ended with the Model S he was driving running out of power and being carted away on a flatbed truck. The article stood in stark contrast to numerous glowing reviews the vehicle had garnered from other writers. The Model S is Motor Trend magazine’s 2013 Car of the Year.

While analysts and others say Musk’s blistering rebuttal — in a Twitter post, he accused Broder of writing a “fake” review — may have been too aggressive, they nonetheless believe it was a smart marketing maneuver. Tesla, which rolled out its Model S sedan last summer, is working to build its brand and consumer loyalty for the vehicle, which ranges in price from $52,400 to $105,400.

“He is out there trying to sell cars, and he has buyers who have made reservations who could pull out,” said Ben Kallo, a Robert W. Baird analyst who covers Tesla. “His coming out and fighting is the right move.”

Musk, citing data collected from the car’s computer, said the vehicle’s electric battery did not run out of juice. He said data also contradicted Broder’s statement that he set the cruise control at 54 mph but often drove slower and lowered the heat to save energy. Musk said the car’s cruise control was never set to 54 and the average cabin temperature was 72 degrees. He did not address Broder’s claim that the car’s battery lost “the electrical equivalent of more than two-thirds of the fuel” in the tank when he left it parked overnight. Broder has denied Musk’s charge that he “consciously set out to sabotage the test.”

Next week, Tesla will release fourth-quarter financial results, which should give an indication of how well the car is selling. Kallo believes the company will report 16,000 new reservations and that it is on track to make 20,000 Model S models at its Fremont assembly line in 2013.

The bad review from one of the nation’s most prestigious news organizations, though, threatened to cast a shadow over the earnings call with analysts.

“Investors will certainly be watching to see if the NYT article disrupted Model S reservation activity,” Pacific Crest Securities analyst Ben Schuman said in an email.

Because Tesla is just beginning to ramp up production of the Model S, it was critical that Musk personally respond to The New York Times review, said Steven Addis, chief executive of Addis Creson, a brand strategy and design firm in Berkeley who owns a Model S.

“Making this a war with The New York Times isn’t the most diplomatic way to go about it,” he said. “But it shows passion. It shows confidence in his product.”

Musk’s reputation as a visionary leader in the mold of late Apple co-founder Steve Jobs — he is also co-founder of space vehicle maker SpaceX and PayPal — should help to stem some of the fallout from the review, Kallo said.

“This is his baby,” he said of the Model S. “You are starting to see the cars on the road. The last thing you want is this negative press to destroy the moment or to reduce that momentum.”

Musk’s kerfuffle with the Times may not be over. The news organization’s public editor, Margaret Sullivan, is expected to weigh in with an article soon.

Jesse Toprak, an analyst with automobile research and pricing website Truecar.com, said Musk’s fight with the Times could even boost Model S sales by bringing the car to the attention of potential buyers.

Those who would use the car for urban driving — and cover far fewer miles a day than Broder did on his long-distance trip — would find “all of the negatives mentioned in the article irrelevant,” he said.

Tesla may be feeling some vindication after CNN reporter Peter Valdes-Dapena, who covers the automotive industry, reported Friday that he retraced Broder’s route this week with no problems. “As I drove into Connecticut, I realized something amazing. Not only did I have enough battery range left, I had plenty,” he wrote.

CNN’s test drive took place during warmer weather conditions, which could have improved the battery’s performance.

The lesson for consumers is to not rely on a single review of a car, particularly an electric one, said John O’Dell, a senior editor at auto information site Edmunds.com. Issues such as battery range depend on road conditions, weather, traffic, topography and a reviewer’s driving style, he said.

“You need to look at dozens of reviews from reputable sources,” O’Dell said.

He thinks the Musk-New York Times controversy will neither help nor hinder Tesla much.

“People who don’t like electric vehicles will point to this as more justification for not liking electric vehicles,” O’Dell said. “People who like electric vehicles a lot will say it’s another example of mainstream media having a bias against electric vehicles.”

Original article can be found here.

Can’t Make It to Sundance? Some Tips for Telluride Instead

Take it from a true film buff: Telluride is a film lover’s film festival. In this guest post on Fest 300, Steven Addis draws from over 15 years of attending the Telluride Film Festival to share his recommendations on how to get the most out of the festival-going experience. If you love to watch movies “until your eyes fall out” and rub shoulders with stars and fellow film connoisseurs, keep reading.

With guest blogger Steven Addis…

Chip’s take: The Sundance Film Festival opened yesterday and, alas, you’re not there. Fortunately, each year during opposite seasons, there’s a second film festival that’s equally enchanting, the Telluride Film Festival during Labor Day weekend at the end of August or early September. My good friend, Steven Addis, has been going to this festival religiously for more than a dozen years and this year will be its 40th anniversary. So, consider doing your planning now. One tip from me (as I was there in 2011 and will likely go again this year): for a complete change of pace, consider making the one-hour drive in the gorgeous Rockies from Telluride to Dunton Hot Springs resort to experience their indoor/outdoor hot springs, lunch and a glorious setting (pricey at $115 per person, but a nice change of pace after sitting in a movie theater all day).

Here’s Steven Addis’ perspective:

In the late ‘90s, my friend Linda invited me to attend the Telluride Film Festival with her. She had been going almost since the beginning, close to 40 years ago. My passion for movies motivated me to say yes and I was instantly hooked and haven’t missed a year since. Well, except for the year when my son was threatening to be born. Alas, he waited until after the festival and I missed it in vain.

When Chip asked me to assemble a few thoughts about how to get the most of the Telluride Film Festival experience, I jumped at the chance. Of course, your mileage may vary as we all have different tastes. But here goes…

Pick the Right Festival for You

Before even deciding on Telluride, you should research the difference between the festivals and make sure this is the one for you. I admit, other than local festivals in San Francisco, I haven’t attended others like Sundance, Toronto, or the myriad others out there. But, I can tell you that Telluride lives up to its reputation for being about the love of film. If you want to see paparazzi hounding movie stars or crash bacchanalian parties with budding starlets, this isn’t the festival for you. Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of stars that travel with their films for Telluride premieres. But, even to them, their presence seems secondary to the films. The energy toward the stars is respectful and low-keyed. Entourages would seem contrived and overly indulgent. George Clooney sat with us in the audience for his and other films he watched. Catherine Deneuve shopped with a friend in the local shops. I sat in the lobby of a hotel discussing Capote with Philip Seymour Hoffman for an hour. The rumor was that Ben Affleck snubbed the Venice Film Festival to instead travel with Argo to Telluride for its North American Debut. You might say that the Telluride audience is more film-struck than star-struck.

Which Pass to Buy

Once you’ve decided to attend Telluride, you’ll face the daunting question of which pass to purchase. This is a tough one. Especially since Telluride virgins have little to go on to appreciate the differences. I’m going to focus on the three primary passes (although there are a couple more):

Acme Pass – One of the largest and best venues is the Chuck Jones Theater. This pass gives you exclusive access to the “Chuck” plus two regular passes to the other venues. PROS: Most of the best films get screened at the Chuck and you’ll get in to see them. For a first-timer, this is a great choice. It’s less expensive than the other passes and seems to provide a great experience. CONS: The Chuck is up in the Mountain Village. If you stay down in town, you’ll be on the gondola a lot. Not a big deal but something to consider. The center of gravity of the festival is definitely in town and not up in the village. Also, you will miss some good films. There are nine venues and over 50 programs during the festival. No matter how you plan, you’re going to miss something great.

Festival Pass – This is the primary pass that most people get. PROS: You have unlimited access in terms of venues and you’ll likely see your top choices at some point during the festival. CONS: Be prepared for some frustration. You will wait in lines an hour or more in advance of a screening. This means that you’ll see fewer films as so much time is eaten up in lines. And, once you’ve waited and finally gotten to the door, you may be turned away if the theater is full. Every year, I hear lots of complaints about this issue. They try to remedy it with a numbered, queue system. But, even that is not without its flaws because the higher priority passes are seated first and, if a lot of them show up, the remaining capacity of the venue drops at the last moment – right before the Festival Pass people are let in.

Patron Pass – If you want to see a ton of films and budget is not an issue, this is the pass for you. PROS: With the right planning, you can see films until your eyes fall out. Four or five in a day is not only feasible, it’s easy. Six is even possible if all the stars align. Patrons are let in before the other passes so they just have to arrive at a venue before the long lines are let in. Waiting is minimal and they even throw you a Patrons’ Brunch where you can cozy up to the filmmakers and stars. CONS: Moolah, dinero, bread, bones, greenbacks. A Patron Pass will set you back almost $4,000. But, about half is a charitable donation so consider it your contribution to the film arts. No other downsides – the Patron experience will get you into a zillion films. But still not enough to feel okay about the cost-per-film math (a calculation not advised for any of the passes).

Getting There

The Telluride airport is like no other I know. It’s carved into the side of the mountain. Just this past year (2012), I heard a story of a man completely freaking out, screaming “we’re going to crash into the mountain!” as the small prop plane took its routine decent into Telluride. The first time is a bit daunting. But, landing right in town is quite convenient. Be prepared, however, to be redirected to Montrose if there’s any inclement weather. I generally just book into Montrose. The 90-minute drive is beautiful and you can get to know other film lovers on the shuttle. An added benefit is that Montrose is at 5700 feet. Driving, rather than flying, the added 3000 feet allows your body to adjust a bit easier. Yes, Telluride is about 9000 feet up.

Where to Stay

This is the most personal decision of all. The choices run from all classes of hotels and condos to finding rooms in people’s homes. If you get the Acme pass, you might want to stay in the pricier Mountain Village to be close to the Chuck Jones theater. If you’re on a budget, a room with others in a rented condo might be the best choice. The folks at ski.com have always been of great help to me. I now stay very close to the base of the gondola. Not only is that central to everything in town, it’s convenient to jumping on the gondola to see a film at the Chuck.

Food

If you’re at all like me, the trip to Telluride is to see movies. I quite literally run from venue to venue and meals are usually what can fit in one hand. Lots of turkey dogs and gyros from the guy with the cart. But, there are also some notable restaurants. My favorites include Cosmopolitan, 221 South Oak, Allred’s, Rustico, Siam, Hongas, and There.

The Buzz

Perhaps the most important tip I can offer is to leave your introverted self at home. Seeing the films you’re going to love, and avoiding the ones you won’t, means knowing the buzz that develops around each. The only way to know is to talk to everyone. Waiting in lines is not wasting time. It’s your chance to poll everyone around you. From year-to-year, I recognize the faces of those whose taste I share. I seek their opinions any chance I get.

And there’s an ethos of this audience. No one talks during a screening and they never spoil a plot afterwards. A great thing about Telluride is the fact that these are premieres and you’ve likely not seen trailers or gotten any hype prior to arriving. I remember sitting in the theater waiting for the new Ang Lee movie to begin. All I heard was that it was something about cowboys. We got none of the incredible hype that would quickly surround Brokeback Mountain (and spoil it). Knowing nothing about a film (other than that people recommend it) makes for much more enjoyable viewing.

Miscellany

Of course, the air is dry and the altitude high. Drink lots of water.

If you travel with a group, understand that some may blaze a different trail. It’s more fun when you can compare notes at the end of the day or vehemently disagree on what makes a good film. Embrace dissention.

This year (2013) will be the festival’s 40th anniversary. There will be a full day added. And, if you’re truly dedicated to see as much as you can, stay through Labor Day and leave on Tuesday. You’ll get to see several films on Monday afternoon that you surely missed. And, crowds thin out a little.

The festival is a rejuvenating experience for me. It renews my faith in the world even when the subject matter is challenging or bleak. The sheer creativity on display is inspiring.

Photo: Pamela Gentile via Telluride Film Festival

Original article can be found here.

John Creson to speak at AIGA SF on February 21

John Creson will be joining a distinguished panel of industry professionals in San Francisco this February to discuss designer-client relationships in an AIGA SF “D.Talk.”

From AIGA SF’s website:

D.Talks is an ongoing series of panel discussions presenting practical information about current trends and hot topics in the world of design and business. Our goal is to foster robust dialog and critical thinking, so crowd participation is an integral part of each event.

This D.Talk is intended for those who are already directly in contact with clients or are interested in setting up your own design firm. How do you maintain a good, long lasting working relationship with clients?

Join AIGA SF for a lively discussion on how to move your client relationship from a one night stand to a marriage made in heaven. Topics will include:

• Managing client relationships
• Creative and Account: A marriage of opposites?
• Articulating good design
• Keeping clients happy
• When to stand up to clients
• Dream clients: a designer’s perspective
• Dream designers: a client’s perspective

Doors open at 6.30pm


6.30-7pm Networking


7-8.30pm D.Talk Discussion

Steven Addis weighs in on Lincoln’s upcoming Twitter-based Super Bowl ad

“Lincoln to go a-Twitter with Super Bowl ad”

by Bruce Horovitz, USA Today

Imagine spending nearly $8 million to air a one-minute Super Bowl commercial, then using those 60 precious seconds to broadcast five dramatized tweets from real people.

That’s what Lincoln will do on Super Bowl Sunday, when new media, in the form of Twitter, briefly takes over old media.

In the luxury car brand’s first-ever Super Bowl spot, the five crowd-sourced tweets — garnered by social media-savvy comedian Jimmy Fallon — will showcase ultra-wacky road-trip experiences. For the Lincoln division of Ford Motor, it’s a high-stakes effort to redo its image and appeal to a new generation of buyers.

“We have to pull out all the stops to get noticed and get Lincoln back on folks’ radar,” says Matt VanDyke, director of global Lincoln marketing.

For Lincoln, which is desperately trying to reinvent itself and appeal to younger drivers with new products, it’s all about using a Super Bowl social media platform to do it. As a luxury brand, Lincoln is a shell of its former self. In 1999, it ranked as one of the best-selling luxury car brands in the U.S., but has fallen far over the past decade.

The big question: Will a social media-inspired ad that airs on one of the world’s most watched sporting events help change that?

Experts — who have not seen the spot, which will be filmed later this week on the West Coast — have mixed opinions.

Weaving social media into the spot is smart, “but people have to want to watch it,” says brand guru Steven Addis. The tweets, he says, “had better be pretty special.”

But “philosophically changing the paradigm to involve passionate customers in their marketing” may be a savvy move by Lincoln, says social media consultant Daina Middleton.

The five tweets were selected from among some 6,117 solicited by Fallon, who asked folks to send him tweets about their craziest road trips. Fallon is under contract to the automaker, but does not appear in the ad.

Perhaps the most intriguing tweet picked was this one from @AdinaSpivak: Two separate strangers proposed marriage twice in one day … incidentally I was on my way to (someone else’s) wedding.

This, and four other tweets are meshed into one story line in a 60-second spot.

“Our approach was, if we’re going to be social, we need creativity,” says VanDyke.

The theme, says Jon Pearce, chief creative officer at ad agency Hudson Rouge, is, “an unexpected story from an unexpected automobile.”

The ad will highlight the redesigned 2013 Lincoln MKZ midsize sedan, the first of four new products over the next four years, says VanDyke. The hope, he says, is to lower the brand’s average buyer age from the current 65 to 55 years.

Other luxury brands, such as Burberry and Gucci, have successfully made similar transitions, says Addis, the brand guru. “At least,” he says, “it will be different from the endless parade of me-too car ads.”

Read the original article here.

Chevrolet Introduces “Find New Roads” Slogan

Is Chevrolet’s new slogan, “Find New Roads,” an imperative for us, or them? Are we to find new destinations, or is Chevy sharing its own self-conscious brand mantra following their 2009 federal bailout and bankruptcy reorganization? Given the expansion into new markets, it appears to be the latter. The new line doesn’t have the same optimistic vigor or clarity of “See the USA in Your Chevrolet,” which it harkens back to. The slogan is encouraging at first but ultimately rings hollow. I imagine American consumers wandering away from Chevrolet on their “new roads” while the company itself finds new avenues to profitability. Does Chevy still run deep in American culture? With this slogan, it seems to be straying away.

Read the Los Angeles Times article here.

Back To Top